|
Introduction
Big Brother remains the ultimate in psychology experiments. With an all
powerful force able to manipulate housemates in any manner it likes, BB is
able to do what most psychology professionals would never dream of even
asking to test, since it wouldn't get passed by even the most liberal of
ethics panels.
The following schematics give my own impressions of how the group develops
over the 11 weeks. There will doubtless be some mistakes in some of my
perceptions of who likes who - not least because some housemates might be
faking it for the benefit of getting ahead in the game, however I believe
the general aspects are mostly correct.
Week'6
back
to weeks 1-5
Notes:
1. Nominations. I've only included details of situations where housemates
voted for each other. Such cases are usually useful in clarifying where
the major alliances are, and who really is not getting on with one
another.
2. Name placement on the board. Names are relative to each other, so that
(in most cases), a housemate next to another is more friendly than one who
is not. Similarly, names directly opposite are usually indicating that
these housemates are in direct opposition, and will be/have nominated each
other.
|